Policy Sections
Mini Sections
EPIA Business Development Unit Intern – Paid Internship
Interim Public Affairs Manager
Network and CrossLingual Projects Director
Account Executive in Public Affairs - Financial Services Practice
Writer/Web Editor - Native English
Consultant (Scientist) to work on the NERC-funded project "VALOR"
Post an EU jobBoosted by carbon trading schemes, natural gas will be the "preferred energy option" in decades to come, experts believe.
Since 2005, some 10,000 large industrial plants in the EU have been required to buy and sell permits to release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. A so-called 'emissions trading scheme' (EU ETS; see EurActiv LinksDossier) enables companies that exceed individual CO2 emissions targets to buy allowances from 'greener' ones to help reach the EU's targets under the Kyoto Protocol.
Initially, pollution credits were grossly over-allocated, forcing down carbon prices in the first phase (2005-2007). In an effort to avoid another collapse of the carbon market, the European Commission set an EU-wide CO2 cap of 2.08 billion tonnes for 2008-2012, giving member states 10% fewer CO2 allowances than requested for the second trading period (EurActiv 29/10/07).
Nevertheless, recent months have seen significant price drops as industrial emissions decrease as a result of the economic slowdown, leaving companies with surplus allowances (EurActiv 09/02/09).
In December 2008, the EU agreed to revise the scheme to achieve steeper reductions for industrial plants (EurActiv 12/12/08). The new scheme, set to come into force in 2013, caps emissions at a maximum of 1.72 billion allowances, which should bring total EU industrial emissions to 21% below 2005 levels by 2020. The compromise agreed between the EU institutions only foresees full auctioning by 2027.
"High carbon prices are a very strong driver of gas-fired power," Ian Cronshaw, head of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) energy diversification division, told liquified natural gas (LNG) industry representatives at an energy breakfast organised by Ifri in Brussels last Thursday (30 April).
He argued that strong prices of around €25-28 a tonne witnessed at the beginning of last year gave gas-fired companies a big competitive advantage in the UK, for example.
EU allowance (EUA) prices have crashed since then, as the financial crisis has significantly reduced industrial demand (EurActiv 09/02/09). Speakers at the seminar nevertheless argued that it is important not to rely on short-term signals to predict the long-term future of gas markets.
William C. Ramsay, director of Ifri's energy programme and a former IEA deputy director, argued that coal and gas are still actively competing in the US, whereas the EU's emissions trading scheme has already skewed the market in favour of gas in the UK.
Last week, a former US government energy official said that the US should also expect a surge in gas-generated power should President Barack Obama manage to pass a cap-and-trade bill, Platts reported.
"If nuclear power grows by a small amount, natural gas will be a big winner in the 2010-30 period," said Guy Caruso, a former head of the US Energy Information Administration. "My personal view is that's probably how it will all play out, even though the Obama administration is very cautious about supporting any fossil fuel," he added.
Caruso pointed out that while coal now accounts for around 50% of electrical power in the US, the share would fall below 40% if emissions trading legislation is pushed through.
LNG to play a big role
"Gas has become the preferred option in power generation in the OECD over the last decades," Cronshaw said. The previously regional gas market had now effectively become a global market, and higher prices would follow despite current drops, he explained.
"Prices of gas are now setting the price of energy," he concluded.
EU domestic natural gas production is expected to decrease in the coming years, which means that there will be a growing need for imports.
Europe relies heavily on Russian gas, which makes up 44% of its imports. The problems of such dependence became apparent earlier this year, when the winter gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine forced the EU to rethink its energy import routes (EurActiv 22/01/09).
As identified by the European Commission in its Second Strategic Reviw in November 2008, liquid natural gas (LNG) would allow Europe to import gas from sources that are not connected with pipelines. Hence, the bulk of Europe's LNG comes from Algeria and Nigeria, while its pipelines run mostly through territories that fall under Russian influence (see EurActiv LinksDossier on 'Pipeline politics').
The process involves liquefying the gas at source and then shipping it in a much more compact form to its destination, where it is turned into gas again.
According to Tom Vanden Borre from the Commission's energy and transport department, LNG is important in terms of enhancing Europe's energy security, as there are more countries producing gas than can be delivered through pipelines.
Vanden Borre told participants in the Brussels' seminar that while Europe's seven LNG terminals currently have annual capacity of 102.4 bcm, a further 60 bcm is under construction. "There is a clear tendency to increase LNG terminal capacity in the EU," he concluded.